Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Saturday, 6th September 2008

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the Newmarket Journal site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Other stacking beacons exist without any fuss



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

JOHN Bone (Journal, May 8) was right to support concerns about increased low flying in the area due to proposals aimed at reducing the demand on the stacking beacon currently shared by Stansted and Luton airports.
But holding beacons like Lambourne in Essex – one of four serving Heathrow – have existed for many years without fuss.

And the lowest altitude that aircraft will fly round the beacon before being called off by the approach controllers is usually 7,000ft.

Of much greater concern for all of us who fly is slotting in to the crowded, high-speed upper airways along which medium to long-haul traffic needs to travel.

Currently, even the en-route controllers can sometimes be kept waiting for information about delays in another country before giving clearance to flights leaving this one.

Missed slots are as much the bane of air traffic controllers as everyone else involved with flying.

Against this, some local low-level activity may not seem so bad if you have been lucky enough to reach your destination safely and joined the queue (or holding stack) before landing.

Peter Seekings-Foster
Boeing Way
Mildenhall




The full article contains 196 words and appears in Newmarket Journal newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 21 May 2008 4:20 PM
  • Source: Newmarket Journal
  • Location: Newmarket
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.